Saturday, February 21, 2015

P&LE GP7s

Speaking of New York Central, I was never really local to the Pittsburgh & Lake Erie, having grown up in New Jersey and Maryland before spending time in New England and moving to California, but my uncle worked for US Steel about 1960 and was in a position to get gimmees from time to time from Pittsburgh railroads. Apparently the P&LE gave him a set of Howard Fogg-painted postcards, which he passed on to me, and which remain favorite items. So I do have a fondness for P&LE as well as NYC. I just ordered a Bachmann GP7 in NYC lightning stripe paint with System lettering and P&LE number:

This is an absolutely beautiful loco. It was a little rough running from the start, but it should do well after running in. However, I already have an Atlas Classic GP7 also numbered 5676 but in P&LE "Pacemaker green":

So I'll need to renumber the Bachmann. It looks like 5676 was delivered in lightning stripe and later repainted green. I also note that the Bachmann incorrectly has the F at the short hood end, no biggie, I'll fix it when I renumber, and will also need to change the direction bit when I reprogram it.

Friday, February 20, 2015

New York Central Items

One of the blogs I follow is New York Central Train Layout. His interests and mine often overlap, and now and then we've had exchanges in the comments on projects we more or less have in common. The other day, he posted on his FAs. Here are a couple of mine, a Bachmann Sound Value FA-2 with a Walthers FB-1. I installed DCC in the FB-1 and speed matched it to the FA-2.

The model comes unnumbered. I had to add number board numbers just to address it on DCC. Not long ago, I got around to adding side numbers from a Micro Scale NYC set, but they aren't shown here.

Tuesday, February 3, 2015

What's Annoying? The Model Citizens Documentary Project

In the summer of 2014, Dr Sara Kelly, a professor at National University in San Diego, initiated a Kickstarter campaign to raise $30,000 to produce Model Citizens, a projected documentary about model railroading. According to the Kickstarter site, the project is to be a "feature-length documentary" that she plans on entering "into the film festival circuit". (Are you kidding me? Cannes?)

Examples of Dr Kelly's documentary skills can be found on the Kickstarter page. In the video "A Futurist Talks Model Railroading", Stuart Forsyth, a futurist, explains what's to come. He describes himself as

a dynamic presenter, facilitator and independent consultant to the legal profession-including bar associations, bar executives and officers, law firms, lawyers, courts, court administrators and judges. A founding member of the Association of Professional Futurists, he offers a broad range of services, with a unique combination of training and experience as a futurist, a lawyer and a bar association executive.
I'd never heard of him before, as either a model railroader or a futurist, although he repeats in the video clip that he's a founding member of the Association of Professional Futurists. His video is an example of what I've found in looking more closely at this project: Mr Forsyth, if the video is a sample of his presentation skills, is anything but "dynamic". "Pompous" and "condescending" are words that come more quickly to mind. But beyond that, despite his claim, his name does not appear on the list of founding members on the Association of Professional Futurists web site.

His biggest insight is that model trains are going to have "more technology". Whew! Er -- Dr Kelly's going to submit this, 90 minutes or more of it, to Sundance and Venice? Mr Forsyth's clip is not unique. The video effort is pure amateur: the camera is wobbly and hand-held, sometimes unstable enough to make you woozy. Although she says the film festival showings will bring younger people to the hobby, she "interviews" a bunch of old codgers, none of them especially well-spoken, and their remarks are desultory, sprinkled with ums and ahs. No one appears to be following a script. The model work, where shown, is average, although there's far more footage of the codgers.

On her Kickstarter page, Dr Kelly estimates that $15,000 is "about a quarter of the total estimated production and post-production cost." Interestingly, her hardware wishlist does not include a tripod. The Kickstarter page indicates that her 2014 campaign received $30,001 in pledges, including 55 backers who pledged $100 or more, one backer who pledged $500 or more, one backer who pledged $1000 or more, one backer who pledged $2000 or more, and one backer who pledged $5000 or more. However, the Kickstarter page says the project will probably require another pledge campaign in 2015.

I e-mailed Dr Kelly with several concerns. I asked her if she's looked at any professionally produced model railroad videos, such as those on the Model Railroader web site. I asked if she'd looked at their production values (as basic as using a tripod and a script) and evaluated whether her own efforts fell short. I asked why someone should pledge significant amounts to such an effort, especially when tax-deductible alternatives are available. She didn't answer these questions, but did suggest I "sit for an interview", presumably like the other old codgers, so I could ramble on.

Why on earth, if Dr Kelly knows so little about the hobby, is she making this documentary and doing such a poor job of it? I'll have more to say.

What's Annoying?

Not everyone finds Barney the Dinosaur or Mr Rogers' Neighborhood annoying. Many do. I tend to lean toward those who do.

In the model railroad hobby, for example, there's controversy over Malcolm Furlow and Lionel Strang, prominent authors in Model Railroader magazine during its decades of doldrums (now, in my view, receding into history). On one hand, many found both Furlow and Strang annoying, and there was a general sense that when MR finally discontinued Strang's "Workin' on the Railroad" column in 2005, things might be about to get better there. In fact, they were, and they did.

On the other hand, every now and then someone posts on a forum something like "Gee, I miss Lionel Strang and Malcolm Furlow. Whatever happened to them?" Controversy, and eventually invective, ensue. (Strang, I fear, is still around. More about this down the road.

To make things easy for first-time visitors, let me be as clear as I can: if you miss Lionel Strang and Malcolm Furlow, you will not enjoy reading this blog. I'm on the other side of that controversy, and probably many others.

In fact, I've created controversy myself. Some people have read my essay "The Sociology of Model Railroading" (available on my linklist) and found it, as one guy said on a forum recently, "spot on". Other people don't like it at all. As above, if you liked the essay, you may well like this blog. If you didn't like the essay, you probably also miss Lionel and Malcolm, and you're probably not going to enjoy any time you spend here. It goes without saying that if you don't like the opinions you see here, your best option is not to visit, and while I'll permit comments, I'll moderate angry or abusive visitors.

I wish everyone well and don't mean to offend private individuals. In fact, I mean to keep private individuals out of it. I will, though, say what's on my mind about public figures in the hobby, hobby magazines and their editorial policies past and present, hobby web sites, hobby forums, hobby organizations, hobby commercial efforts, hobby fundraising campaigns, published hobby authors, and other hobby new-media figures, good and bad. I will probably also post from time to time about my own hobby interests.